Privatization

Contracting out and public-private partnerships are risky and expensive. They make our public services less accountable to the communities they serve.  With privatization, costs rise, quality suffers, and local control is weakened.

Guide

Asking the right questions: A guide for municipalities considering P3s

This newly-updated second edition of Asking the right questions is co-authored by the late John Loxley and his son, researcher Salim Loxley.

The guide reviews the latest evidence and experiences from across Canada and around the world, taking a critical look at the case for and against using public-private partnerships (P3s) for municipal infrastructure. This online text is adapted from the print version of the guide.

Through a series of questions, the authors outline the problems that accompany infrastructure and service privatization, and highlight the value of keeping vital assets and services public.

Cover image
Guide

Bring our work in house: How to stop contracting out

Privatization is on the rise. But we can fight back and bring our jobs and services in house, where they belong. 

Bring our work in house: How to stop contracting out gives CUPE members the tools they need to end privatization. It covers the benefits of in-house services, gives tips on engaging members and developing a plan, and shares practical ways to make a winning case.

The guide is part of a toolkit that includes a new Union Education workshop. In this course, members learn about contracting in and map out the steps to bring jobs and services in house in their workplace.

More resources

Cover image
Guide

Protecting our work from privatization: How to fight contracting out at the bargaining table

The Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) is at the forefront of the fight against the privatization of public services and has been since our union was founded in 1963. The collective power of CUPE members is our best defence against privatization, and CUPE collective agreements are a powerful tool in that fight. When CUPE members organize to achieve, and strictly enforce, contract language that prevents or restricts our employers from contracting out work, we can protect public sector union jobs and public services. CUPE collective agreements are far more likely than other union contracts to have some type of protection against contracting out. CUPE locals regularly use their collective agreement language to stop privatization in its tracks.