Angella MacEwen | CUPE Economist

Every election we hear the same old story - it would be great if we could have high quality, universal public services, but how are we going to pay for it? So we end up getting some variation on corporate tax cuts and targeted personal tax cuts or credits “for the middle class.” A few people get a little bit of extra money back at tax time, but the rest of us get short-changed through cuts to services.

The good news is that it doesn’t have to be this way. Affordability isn’t just about “buck-a-beer” - we can think about affordability in terms of the savings we get from public services. For example, a single-payer universal pharmacare program could save families an average of $500 per year. Quebec’s child care program saves families with young children thousands of dollars per year.

The NDP plan to retrofit all buildings in Canada by 2050 would save families $900 or more per year. That’s why CUPE has been encouraging members and locals to get engaged in this election, and focus on issues that matter to working people. We have an opportunity to elect a government that will strengthen our public services and create good-paying jobs for workers, create national universal phar macare, build more affordable housing, and take the bold action needed to fight climate change.

Making services universal has several advantages – it means that everyone has a stake in the availability and quality of service, so it’s far harder for governments to make cuts. Also, targeted programs almost always create situations where someone has too much money to qualify for the public option, but not enough money to pay for the private option. This is the case for so many core services right now – access to subsidized medicines, dental care, mental health care, child care, public transit, and housing are only a few examples. Universality reduces the inequality of outcomes, and helps to build strong communities and social solidarity, as Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett showed in The Spirit Level.

You might not need health care, pharmacare or child care right now, but it’s good to know that help will be there when you do need it. Most of us get far more value from public services than we pay in taxes. Statistics Canada has quantified exactly how much value we receive from public spending on health care, education, and other government services like housing, recreation, and culture – in 2018, it was an average of $12,500 per person. And these numbers hide the most important part of the story – that most of those services would cost far more if you had to replace them with a private sector option.

How we pay for it – tax fairness

In the long run, high quality universal public services often pay for themselves – for example, economists have shown that subsidized child care in Quebec returned $1.47 for every dollar spent by the government. But in the short term, we can pay for them by undoing some of the changes in the tax system that have unfairly put most of the burden on workers.

In 1980 the federal corporate tax rate was at 36 per cent. Since then the rate has been slashed by subsequent Liberal and Conservative governments, and is now at an all-time low of 15 per cent. The justification for cutting corporate tax rates and introducing new loopholes is that corporations will often use the money to create jobs and invest in productivity-enhancing research. But as corporate taxes fell, business invest ment stayed more or less the same. What increased was corporate profits, executive payouts, and inequality.How much income tax large corporations paid, 2011-2016

Over time, this has resulted in a record amount of hoarding by corporations. Data from Finance Canada shows large corporations withheld about a third of the taxes owed to the Canada Revenue Agency, which added up to $10 billion. And earlier this year the Parliamentary Budget Officer estimated that up to $25 billion is lost every year to legal loopholes and illegal tax evasion through tax havens.

Canadians for Tax Fairness, the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, and the Broadbent Institute have all identified tax reform as a key challenge for whoever forms the next government. The good news is that the research has been done on which are the biggest loopholes, and how to fix them. We just need a government that will restore balance to our tax system, by addressing both avoidance (using legal loopholes to avoid paying taxes) and evasion (using illegal methods to reduce taxes owing), especially for large corporations.

Fortunately, the federal NDP has made broad-based tax fairness a central part of their election platform for 2019. Their plan includes some new proposals, and rolls back changes that have only benefited the super-rich. For example, the NDP has committed to restoring the corporate tax rate to 18 per cent, increasing the top marginal tax rate for individuals earning more than $210,000, and introducing a wealth tax of one per cent on wealth over $20 million. They also plan to reverse a huge tax cut on capital gains introduced in 2000 by then-Finance Minister Paul Martin. Right now, when you sell an investment, only half of the increase in value counts as taxable income. The NDP proposes to restore this to 75 per cent.

So, the next time someone says we can’t afford high-quality public services, tell them that public services make life more affordable and are the best deal for our communities. And if we worry less about balancing the budget at any cost, and instead make the tax system fairer for people than for corporations, we can fund these critical building blocks of a fair and equitable society.