UBCM Resolutions Summary

Please note that this page is from our archives. There may be more up-to-date content about this topic on our website. Use our search engine to find out.

Municipal politicians at the Union of British Columbia
Municipalities(UBCM) took strong stands on many issues at their
convention this year, including ambulance and child care funding,
infrastructure funding, water, industrial water licences and TILMA.

 

  • Ambulance and Child Care Funding

    Both resolutions
    demanding the provincial government restore sufficient funding to
    ambulance and child care services passed without amendment. Ambulance
    service response time has dropped to levels below those in the 1980s
    with 50 per cent more calls in the last decade alone and an aging
    population. The B.C. government’s own Progress Board and the B.C.
    government’s own Finance Committee have both called for increased
    childcare funding, particularly with cuts from the federal government.
    The B.C. government has actually cut childcare funding after the
    federal government did.

  • Infrastructure Funding

    Canada’s infrastructure
    funding deficit is in the tens of billions of dollars. The UBCM passed
    many resolutions calling for greater federal and provincial support for
    infrastructure projects. The federal government today announced $49.1
    million for 199 new buses for TransLink (only half are new as the rest
    replace aging buses). Within that announcement, however, Public Safety
    Minister Stockwell Day reiterated the value of public-private
    partnerships, which can have extraordinary cost overruns, secret
    contracts, and onerous pressure on local governments to even prepare
    and manage privatization bids. Minister Day said privatization is
    necessary and “can be successful.” Even privatized infrastructure
    projects that have not had massive cost overruns, still remove public
    accountability and autonomy.

  • Water

    Tofino’s Resolution B27, the Water Declaration,
    was a strong resolution designed to entrench water as a common good and
    a public resource. While most delegates spoke strongly in favour of it,
    one person stood to propose an amendment to remove water delivery from
    the resolution. The amendment was soundly defeated and the Water
    Declaration passed.

  • Industrial Water Licences

    Industries given permission
    by the provincial government to generate hydro electricity for
    industrial purposes have been given the freedom by the B.C. Supreme
    Court to use that electricity for whatever they wish. They could wind
    down industrial activities, lay off workers, harm local economies and
    take part in the newly deregulating continental power market featuring
    blackout, billions in price gouging and Enron. The UBCM has voted in
    favour of asking the province to force industries to use their
    electrical power for industrial purposes.


  • TILMA

    Resolution A3, the Trade, Investment and Labour
    Mobility Agreement (TILMA), passed in overwhelming fashion. Economic
    Development Minister Colin Hansen did a poor job of addressing local
    governments’ concerns at a 3-hour pre-convention workshop on Monday.
    TILMA allows a government-picked trade dispute panel that operates
    outside our court system to determine whether a local government’s
    bylaw or regulation violates TILMA, with a penalty of up to $5 million
    for each infraction. The Agreement states that only the province would
    have to pay the fine, however for months Minister Hansen has not stated
    that the provincial government will not come after local governments to
    recoup that cost.

    On Monday he extended that ambiguity by not
    confirming that the province will not punish local governments. Also,
    on direct questioning he further could not guarantee that local
    governments’ authority will not be reduced by TILMA. Like the Water
    Declaration resolution, when the convention debated the TILMA
    resolution, someone tried to amend it by limiting the options the UBCM
    could use in negotiating local governments’ relationship to TILMA. That
    amendment was also soundly defeated and the strong UBCM motion against
    TILMA passed.