About this report Who's pushing privatization Water giants extend their reach Health care giants bid for home care Corporate classrooms costly Canadians confront rising user fees The case for public investment Trade agenda propels privatization Young people and the public sector Public works Thumbs up, thumbs down Sources Get the ARP  Who's pushing privatization?
 Corporate pushers
 Loaded questions: Pollsters push privatization
 Business on board but...
 Newspapers take different stands
 Privatization pusher extraordinaire
 Private health care won’t mean shorter line-ups
 For-profit kidney care a health hazard
 The Yawning Gap
 Water giants extend their reach...

Newspapers take different stands

While our research suggests that journalists tend to mirror Canadians’ scepticism about privatization, not all Canada’s newspapers reflect that view.

One in particular, the National Post, consistently offers more positive than negative stories about privatization, and generally covers the issue more than other papers.

An independent agency conducted a content analysis for CUPE on media coverage of privatization from October 1998 to September 1999. Issues, messages and sources were analysed in a sampling of 953 articles from 28 media outlets.

The Globe and Mail and Southam papers taken as a whole were slightly more likely to publish articles critical of privatization than messages supporting it. The Toronto Star most consistently raised red flags around privatization.

Letters to the editor, editorials and news coverage tend to be more critical of privatization, citing concerns about user fees, cost and quality. Columnists, on the other hand, were more inclined to support privatization.

Media coverage was most critical of privatization in corrections, parks, energy and health; most supportive in the area of financial services.

Attitudes toward PPPs

ARP home page Previous: Business on board but... Next: Privatization pusher extraordinaire